Roof Crush Accidents and Spinal Cord Injury
- Author Elton Willis
- Published January 21, 2011
- Word count 477
Highway traffic accident data collected by the National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) reveal that passenger vehicle rollover accidents resulted in 32% of all highway accident fatalities between 1995 and 1999 but only accounted for 3-4% of all types of accidents where the vehicle was damaged severely enough to require towing. An occupant of a vehicle involved in a highway crash is therefore 13 times more likely to die from their injuries if the vehicle rolls over during the accident.
The risk of serious non-fatal injury is also higher for rollover accidents, representing 18% of all serious injuries sustained in highway accidents during the same period. Occupants of vehicles that rolled over during an accident are 6 times more likely to suffer a serious injury when compared to all other types of accidents.
During the 1988 to 1999 period approximately 23,376 light-duty vehicle occupants per year sustained serious or fatal injuries during rollover accidents. Of these, 7460 or 32% sustained at least one injury due to contact with the roof, and contact with the roof is how 89% of these victims received their most serious injuries. A full 93%, or 6,934 rollover vehicle occupants per year, were seriously or fatally injured from the roof being crushed during the accident. Half of these victims were wearing seatbelts at the time of the accident, but studies examining the risk of head and neck injury due to the roof being crushed revealed a greater risk if restrained within the vehicle.
The risk for sustaining fatal injuries was increased substantially if the occupants were exposed to outside arc forces in an SUV (0.99% vs. 0.19%). In 2007, 59% of fatal injuries sustained by SUV occupants occurred during a rollover accident. By comparison, 46% and 25% of passengers in light-duty pickup trucks and cars, respectively, received fatal injuries during rollover accidents. The strength of the roof in relation to the weight of the vehicle is a major factor determining whether occupants will sustain a serious injury during a rollover accident. The velocity of roof intrusion will also be slower the stronger the roof is. The velocity of the head strike matters as well and current understanding suggests a velocity over 7 mph will result in serious injury, and a velocity over 10 mph will result in fatal injuries. Current federal standards (FMVSS216) require light-duty vehicles to withstand 1-1/2 times the weight of the vehicle. Laboratory testing of several American production vehicles from this period revealed an SWR between 2.5 and 3.5 was required to prevent significant roof intrusion into the passenger compartment, depending on which test was used.
Controversy surrounded the actual cause of head and neck injuries suffered in roof crush accidents for several decades, but this has been resolved. A recent study measuring the forces impacting cervical sensors in crash test dummies revealed diminished headroom at the outer arc of the rollover is the most likely cause of spinal injury. Until then, spinal cord injury lawyers will continue to have a steady supply of clients.
Contact The Ammons Law Firm or call 1-866-523-1630 to speak to an AV Rated Spinal Cord Injury Lawyer. For more than 20 years, Rob Ammons and his team of personal injury attorneys have helped obtain millions of dollars of settlements for their deserving clients.
Read more spinal cord injury articles: http://www.spinalcordinjurylawyer.org/Media/SpinalCordInjuryArticles.aspx
Article source: https://art.xingliano.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Personalized Dining Experiences: How AI POS Systems Learn Your Customers’ Preferences
- Perth Is One of Australia's Fastest Growing Cities. Here Is What That Looks Like on the Ground
- Ireland–China Relations: A Century Built on Exchange and Understanding
- Mindfulness: Living in Harmony with the Elements
- Lash Extension Aftercare Starts With Proper Removal
- How Lash Techs Can Make Removal Appointments More Comfortable
- Electric And Hybrid Car Leasing: The Smart Move For 2026
- What Clients Should Know Before a Lash Extension Removal Appointment
- Common Lash Removal Mistakes New Lash Techs Should Avoid
- Lash Remover Cream vs. Liquid Remover: What Lash Techs Should Know
- Common Lash Removal Mistakes New Lash Techs Should Avoid
- Lash Remover Cream vs. Liquid Remover: What Lash Techs Should Know
- Common Eyebrow Tint Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
- Outdoor Makeup Tips for Hot Days: What to Keep Simple Around the Eyes
- How to Choose the Right Brow Tint Shade for a Natural Look
- Best Eye Makeup Ideas for Summer Travel and Weekend Trips
- Magnetic Lashes vs. Strip Lashes: Which Is Easier for Beginners?
- Lotus Carved Decorative Doors
- Where Your Donation Matters Most: Helping the Poor with Medical Care and Animal Welfare in India
- How Sponsoring Elderly Care in India Creates Lasting Social Impact
- Motorcycle Accidents in Hattiesburg: Mississippi's Pure Comparative Fault Advantage and How It Protects Injured Riders
- Dog Bite Injuries in Colorado: How the Strict Liability Statute Works and What Injured Victims Can Recover
- Truck Accident Claims in Green Bay: How Local Industries Shape Liability
- Dog Bites in San Luis Obispo: California's Strict Liability & What It Means for Victims
- How the Region's Paper and Food Processing Industries Shape the Commercial Vehicle Liability Landscape
- Colorado Dog Bite Injury Claims and What the State's Strict Liability Law Means for Victims
- THE QUIET GRANDEUR: VINTAGE CARVED ARMOIRES FROM MOGUL INTERIOR
- Wellness by Design: Nature's Harmony in Carved Wood Doors
- Why People With Diabetes Need to Take Special Care of Their Feet
- Calcaneodynia: Understanding Heel Pain