1.5 Seconds? Accident Reconstruction Truth
- Author Michael Padway
- Published November 9, 2011
- Word count 938
A car is going to make a left hand turn in front of you. How much time will you really have? Are you going to survive, or will you be toast? What happens, second by second, to determine who makes it, and who gets hurt? We know that time, speed, and distance are all involved, but how do things really happen?
Most law-enforcement investigators and accident reconstructionists who are not trained in motorcycle accidents make a simple analysis based on the assumption that it takes the rider .75 seconds to perceive the danger, and another .75 seconds to react, for a total of 1.5 seconds. At the end of that period, the rider starts to brake (and/or steer), and the reconstructionist uses formulae to determine how much time, speed, and distance would elapse before impact. Since the rule of thumb is that feet per second is about 1.5 times the speed in mph, this is a simple and convenient way to figure out what happened.
For example, if the motorcycle is going 30 miles per hour, it travels at 45 feet per second. Once the left-hand turn starts, the rider takes 1.5 seconds to perceive and react, so he travels about 67.5 feet before he begins to brake.
Simple, elegant, easy to use. Unfortunately, also completely wrong.
These shopworn estimates of perception and reaction time come from experiments done long ago, using simulators with a fake steering wheel, accelerator and brake. When the light goes from green to red, the subject moves their foot from the accelerator to the brake, and a timer records the result; not very realistic.
Let’s try again, and see what you are faced with in a real accident.
Your perception time includes the time it takes to see, the time it takes to focus attention, and decision time. Only then can you begin to react, and only when your reaction is complete and you do something will your motorcycle begin braking or swerving. The whole time, you are moving towards disaster.
You’re not expecting an accident. You’re cruising along, enjoying the ride, as you approach an intersection. There’s an oncoming car in the left-turn pocket, but you expect it to wait for the light. As you get closer, you notice that the car is slowly pulling forward. You figure it’s just pulling closer to the line. You keep going, but pay a little more attention to the car. Now you are closer to the intersection. The car gets closer to the line, then over it, and accelerates into the intersection. At this point, you have to make sense of a complex and confusing set of facts, one that is contrary to your expectations, and you are beginning to panic. It takes time for your brain to understand what is going on, calculate the trajectory of the car, and deal with the danger.
It doesn’t take a scientist to realize that the perception of this set of circumstances is confusing, and it is going to take you longer than reacting to a green light switching to red. Precious time is gone. Studies show that perception and response time is greatly increased by situations that do not initially seem critical. Your motorcycle keeps going forward until you brake or swerve.
Included in "perception time" is the concept of attention. It took time for you to take attention from the tasks of riding and transfer attention to the task of tracking the now-dangerous left-turning vehicle, and analyze evasive options.
Attention is something we all agree is critical to accident avoidance. Attention is related to the ability to process information. Studies show the ability to switch focus of attention does not change with age. However, uncertainty about the location of information relevant to a certain task does change with age. This would suggest that older drivers are at a disadvantage in complex and demanding traffic situations. This may be one of the reasons many older drivers drive slowly. Vision, particularly night vision, is worse, and it takes longer to clearly see the situation.
Unfortunately, you’re not done. Included in "perception time," is "decision" time. In that situation an internal dialogue takes place. How fast is the car going? How fast it is accelerating? Will the driver see and stop? Can I slow enough to go behind? Can I get in front? At what point should I get off the brakes and swerve? How much front brake should I use? How much rear? More time is gone. Your bike keeps going forward. While you sort this out, the car accelerates into the intersection in front of you.
Forget the theoretical 3/4th of a second. More like several seconds have been spent.
Finally, you begin deciding what to do. More time, more distance. Time’s up. You are now way too close to do anything successfully. You are going to hit the side of the car, and go flying over it. Even if you catch a little brake, expect to be six or seven feet in the air as your limbs flail towards a landing more than 20 feet away.
We can talk about things that will help avoid a collision. Covering the front brake can save a small amount of time. Having a foot on the rear brake saves time, but can lead to a skid-induced highside. But we need to stop looking at motorcycle accidents using methods designed for car accidents.
Mike Padway is a motorcycle lawyer with a passion for riding and riding safety. He handles cases throughout the state and can be contacted by email: mike@michaelpadway.com.
This article was originally published in Citybike Magazine.
Michael Padway and Associates is recognized as the "go to" law firm for riders injured in accidents. Michael Padway has lectured nationally for the American Bar Association, written for motorcycle enthusiast publications, his blog posts are extensively re-circulated on the internet, and motorcycle riders
Article source: https://art.xingliano.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- What is Fly Fishing?
- Minimalist or Statement Sliding Barn Door: Which Is Right for Your Space
- How to Style Antique Indian Armoires & Sideboards in a Modern Home
- Custom Antique Doors: How Mogul Interior Sizes Vintage Doors to Fit Any Space
- Personalized Dining Experiences: How AI POS Systems Learn Your Customers’ Preferences
- Perth Is One of Australia's Fastest Growing Cities. Here Is What That Looks Like on the Ground
- Ireland–China Relations: A Century Built on Exchange and Understanding
- Mindfulness: Living in Harmony with the Elements
- Lash Extension Aftercare Starts With Proper Removal
- How Lash Techs Can Make Removal Appointments More Comfortable
- Electric And Hybrid Car Leasing: The Smart Move For 2026
- What Clients Should Know Before a Lash Extension Removal Appointment
- Common Lash Removal Mistakes New Lash Techs Should Avoid
- Lash Remover Cream vs. Liquid Remover: What Lash Techs Should Know
- Common Lash Removal Mistakes New Lash Techs Should Avoid
- Lash Remover Cream vs. Liquid Remover: What Lash Techs Should Know
- Common Eyebrow Tint Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
- Outdoor Makeup Tips for Hot Days: What to Keep Simple Around the Eyes
- How to Choose the Right Brow Tint Shade for a Natural Look
- Best Eye Makeup Ideas for Summer Travel and Weekend Trips
- Magnetic Lashes vs. Strip Lashes: Which Is Easier for Beginners?
- Lotus Carved Decorative Doors
- Where Your Donation Matters Most: Helping the Poor with Medical Care and Animal Welfare in India
- Solutions For Clinical Trials
- How Sponsoring Elderly Care in India Creates Lasting Social Impact
- Motorcycle Accidents in Hattiesburg: Mississippi's Pure Comparative Fault Advantage and How It Protects Injured Riders
- Dog Bite Injuries in Colorado: How the Strict Liability Statute Works and What Injured Victims Can Recover
- Truck Accident Claims in Green Bay: How Local Industries Shape Liability
- Dog Bites in San Luis Obispo: California's Strict Liability & What It Means for Victims
- How the Region's Paper and Food Processing Industries Shape the Commercial Vehicle Liability Landscape