Impact of Inflation and Interest Rate Volatility on Housing Affordability in Nigeria

HomeReal Estate

  • Author Daniel Yamah
  • Published January 14, 2026
  • Word count 2,431

Nigeria's housing industry is going through a major transformation. The situation has developed to the point where the rising inflation and subsequently increasing interest rates have collectively pushed families of middle- and lower-income categories out of the formal housing sector. During the period of 2020 to 2024, the inflation rate in Nigeria averaged 18.2% and reached 34.6% in December 2024, the highest in that period, while the Central Bank of Nigeria raised the Monetary Policy Rate from 11.5% in 2019 to 27.5% in 2024. As a result, the lending rates for commercial mortgages have gone up to 25-35% a year, thus making it impossible for most of the homebuyers who previously had the potential to buy a house to enter the formal housing market.

One of the issues that needs to be considered is the measurement and prediction of the extent to which affordability will be adversely affected by inflation, together with construction costs rising and high-interest rates making mortgages inaccessible. Despite the fact that the main scholarship is focused on the quantitative aspect of determining housing impoverishment, there is still not sufficient comprehension when it comes to the forecasting of varied impacts of economic changes on the affordability rating by income groups in Nigeria. The current research provides an answer to this problem by correlating inflation-adjusted household income, construction cost inflation, and effective mortgage rates, thus forming the basis for predicting the trend of affordability up to 2040.

The issue will be tackled by examining housing price-to-income ratios, construction cost indices, mortgage penetration rates, and household expenditure surveys that are representative of the current economic situation. The currency devaluation has led to an increase in prices for construction materials that are of high quality and dependent on imports in Nigeria, while the tightening monetary policy to control inflation has made credit so pricey that it’s inaccessible for most. The cumulative effect of these is that the demand for housing is curtailed as financing becomes unaffordable, while the supply of housing is also discouraged due to high costs.

Short-Term Implications (2025-2030)

The main impact here is the slow but steady fall in homeownership among formal sector workers. The mortgage-to-GDP ratio was a mere 0.6% in 2023, which is among the world’s lowest rates, and thus, the affordability stress will be further fueled by income inequality. The builders will be forced to choose either the high costs or the low demand, which will lead to the shrinkage of the construction industry. The National Housing Fund alone has over ₦1.4 trillion in unutilized contributions, but the housing shortage on the demand side is due to the fact that the eligible contributors are not getting access to affordable mortgages, while the capital available for such loans is more than enough.

The luxury housing supply will continue to grow gradually in the segments designed for the diaspora and high-net-worth individuals, which will further the spatial inequality. In Lagos State, the average house price was ₦45 million in 2024, and this price was 22.5 times the median annual household income, thereby greatly exceeding the UN-Habitat's suggested 3:1 affordability ratio. This gap will push the urban sprawl more as households will migrate to informal settlements in the city outskirts that are poorly supplied with basic amenities.

Long-Term Projections (2030-2040)

If nothing changes, the housing deficit in Nigeria, which is currently pegged at 22 million units, will balloon to about 35 million in 2040 on account of the continuous population growth of 2.6% per annum and urbanization to the extent of 70% by 2050. Real estate investment will dry up as the risk-adjusted returns will be negative in an unstable macroeconomic environment; thus, the investments will flow into short-term speculative assets instead of housing stock that is not productive.

Urban planning will suffer a series of failures. The infrastructures are not able to cope with the unplanned settlements, and this results in a situation where there is no water supply, sanitary problems, and delays in transport. The cities of Lagos, Abuja, and Port Harcourt will experience more congestion and the environmental degradation of the low-income population moving to flood-prone areas and urban peripheries.

Socio-economic stability is a severe threat, and housing stress is one of the most influential factors in a household's financial condition. Housing stress is closely related to a number of negative consequences, such as lower household savings, later marriage, and human capital investment. The youth unemployment that is currently high at 42.5% will worsen as younger people stay in the wrong places, unable to afford living where jobs exist. This kind of situation can potentially stall the demographic dividend as it could lead to social unrest similar to the #EndSARS protests, where one of the causes was the unaffordability of housing.

The Nigerian economy has severe structural limitations. The naira depreciated 380 in 2020, and by the end of 2024, it was 1,600 per U.S. dollar, which in turn led to an increase in the prices of imported materials—cement additives, steel, tiles, and finishing products. The domestic cement industry, which has a maximum production capacity of more than 50 million tonnes annually, still suffers from price distortions caused by oligopolistic market structures, and the market has become 45% more expensive between 2022 and 2024.

Housing policies are not well-coordinated; they are disjointed. The National Housing Policy 2012 is centered on the combination of public and private sectors in housing and advancement of the mortgage market, but its implementation has been very irregular. The Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria, which underwent restructuring in 2014, has granted only 4,521 mortgages from 2019 to 2023, which is a number that is insignificant when compared with the annual household formation rates, which are over 1.2 million. The problems of bureaucratic land administration are still prevalent. The Land Use Act (1978), which demarcates state governors as landowners, makes it difficult to obtain a title, and there are instances of fraud. It takes on average 90-180 days to register land in Lagos State, which is a real disincentive for people to develop through the legal channels.

Urbanization is imbalanced in different parts of the country. Lagos State is the main attraction for about 600,000 people per year, but only 30,000 new housing units are added each year. The fast-growing Abuja suburbs of Lugbe, Kuje, and Gwagwalada are not receiving the needed infrastructure investment, although they are rapidly expanding in population. The northern cities-Kano and Kaduna-are affected by insecurity and poverty, which makes the demand for formal housing low while informal settlements are unregulated and expanding.

The mortgage finance system is evolving. The number of primary mortgage institutions in 2024 will be restricted to 32, down from 44 in 2017, indicating that there are fewer hedgers left in the market, and those remaining are not too strong. The mortgage penetration of 0.6% of GDP is far below the 30% in South Africa and 3% in Kenya, proving thus the presence of systemic dysfunction. The National Housing Fund, which is obligatory for workers to contribute to, is not much utilized because of the extended application process and the high-interest rates in comparison with household incomes.

Legal and Bureaucratic Barriers

The government was the only party involved in this case, and according to the Land Use Act, it became the owner of the land. In this case, the land became scarce as a result of artificial means, and the landlords demanded rent. The complete procedure of obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy included several different agencies, such as surveyors, land bureaus, and the governor’s consent, and every single one of them charged formal and informal fees. This administrative process increased the total cost of land to around 40-50% in major cities, which is a significant increase compared to only 10-15% in efficient markets. The issue of uncertainty connected to the titles made it impossible for the lenders to count on mortgages, as the court system for foreclosure would be lengthy and uncertain.

Financial System Limitations

Mortgage origination is the choice area of their operation in commercial banks, but still they enforce the low loan-to-value ratios, which is a maximum of 70% and also require that the borrowers contribute 30% of the price as equity, which is way too much for the median income earners to afford. The risk of maturity mismatch between the short and long-term borrowing is created by the fluctuations of the interest rates: banks are providing long-term mortgage loans that are recession-proof, and then they charge high-interest rates. The credit information infrastructure in the country is very poor, as by 2024, the Credit Bureau would only have access to 15 million people, limiting the credit risk assessment. The problem of collateral perfection is still there, as it is very much dependent on property registries and enforcement measures, which are weak.

Infrastructure Deficits

Housing affordability is a factor that depends not only on the cost of the unit but also on the availability of infrastructure. Most of the developing areas lack basic amenities like clean water, electricity, paved roads, and waste management systems. Connecting the housing unit to the off-grid infrastructure, such as boreholes, generators, and septic systems, contributes approximately ₦3-5 million to the cost of each housing unit, which makes up 15-20% of the total cost for affordable housing. Developers are discouraged from building homes on greenfield sites without onsite infrastructure because, although the land is cheaper, infrastructure is burdensome.

Data Availability Challenges

Nigeria does not have a dependable housing statistics record. The last national housing survey happened in 2006, and its data is still the main source of information; current deficit estimates are based on interpolations and anecdotal evidence. Data on the cost of construction, price variations among different areas, and household spending are either proprietary or inconsistent, and there is no uniformity. The non-uniformity makes it difficult to develop evidence-based policies and also impedes the planning of the private sector. There is another risk of misallocation of resources to the wrong income segments or geographical areas due to the reliance on the unavailability of reliable data for affordability interventions.

Solution 1: Inflation-Indexed Mortgage Instruments

The data from Latin America indicates that inflation-indexed mortgages are a method to maintain affordability even during periods of significant economic instability. The Chilean Unidad de Fomento system, with its daily inflation adjustments, allows maintaining constant purchasing power over 20-30 year mortgages, although the historical inflation rate has been 8-12% per year. Nigeria needs to require Primary Mortgage Institutions to provide CPI-indexed mortgages with rates starting at inflation plus 3% to 5%, thereby guaranteeing lenders' real returns and stabilizing debt-service ratios for borrowers. The Central Bank could support the process by providing partial credit guarantees to reduce default risks during the transition.

Solution 2: Construction Cost Stabilization through Local Material Substitution

A study by the Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute revealed that the use of local laterite blocks, bamboo reinforcement, and earth compaction can yield a 30-40% reduction in construction costs while still ensuring safety. The government should give tax credits as a reward for those developers who obtain more than 60% of their materials from local sources and set up quality control programs to verify compliance. The burden of rising import prices that is passed through inflation is eliminated, and simultaneously, the government is playing a part in creating rural jobs in the places where the raw material is being sourced.

Solution 3: Digital Land Administration Reform

The digitization of land registration in Kenya led to a reduction of 64% in registration time to only 15 days and a 40% decline in corruption during the years 2010-2020. Nigeria has to set up blockchain-based land registries starting from Lagos and Kaduna, and thereafter moving to other areas that will easily and transparently conduct title searches, grant consents automatically, and use smart contracts for property transfer. The Federal Ministry of Housing and state governments should work together to make the digital systems compatible, and thus, the land acquisition costs will be decreased, and the mortgage collateral will be more certain. This will directly remove bureaucratic obstacles and create a trustworthy ambiance in the financial system.

Solution 4: Targeted Subsidy Mechanisms

The well-targeted subsidies, covering 20-30% of the costs of the units for families with 50-120% of the median income, were proven by the Rwandan Social Housing Program as efficacious to attract the private sector to participate without the distortion of the markets. The Nigerian government will need to reform the National Housing Fund in such a way that it provides subsidies immediately rather than through a contributory fund, and also houses for families with an annual income of ₦250,000-₦600,000. It is necessary to offer means-tested subsidies which are verifiable through the Bank Verification Number-linked income verification so that elite capture is avoided. Access to affordable housing has become more accessible, and at the same time, the private developer delivery continues to maintain market discipline.

Solution 5: Interest Rate Risk Mitigation through Long-Term Funding Facilities

The South African National Housing Finance Corporation provides long-term (15-25 years) bonds at subsidised rates to primary lenders and consequently also keeps the fixed-rate mortgages even during the periods when the policy rates are very active and volatile. Nigeria could create a similar facility that would be funded through the sale of diaspora bonds, development finance institutions’ investments, and pension funds’ investments, thus making use of the large pension asset base of ₦18 trillion. This facility would be offering funds for 10-15 years at fixed rates of 8-10% which in turn, would allow mortgage lenders to sell such products to borrowers at 6-8% fixed-rate products and still not be affected by the oscillation of the Central Bank policy rate.

Policy Implications

Policymakers must understand that housing affordability is not just a question of supply but also a major macroeconomic and institutional problem. Housing cost indexes should be treated as part of the inflation in the monetary policy transmission mechanism. Therefore, the interest rate issue would be discussed concerning its impacts on housing affordability. Tax policy should shift housing subsidies from the supply side, usually favouring the developer, to the demand side, which enhances household buying power.

Federal and state governments should have regulations that are not only distinct but also interrelated. The National Assembly should amend the Land Use Act to ease the decentralisation of the certificate issuance and to set the maximum processing timelines that will automatically result in approvals once the timelines have lapsed. Banking regulations should allow the creation of longer-term deposit products to manage the risk of maturity mismatch; this might be accomplished with tax incentives on savings instruments maturing in over ten years.

Building institutional capacity is of the highest priority. The Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria will need a recapitalisation that is far from mere symbolism; it will only have a real impact and undertake meaningful market-making activities at the sum of ₦500 billion. The state governments have to continuously professionalise their land administration through the adoption of performance contracts, digital accountability systems, and strict anti-corruption measures.

Yamah is a multidisciplinary creative—an architect, researcher, and storyteller—with a strong foundation in design and data-driven insight. He is the Creative Director of Stunning.Sustainability on Instagram.

For inquiries, partnerships, or speaking engagements, please contact yamahdaniel@gmail.com.

Article source: https://art.xingliano.com
This article has been viewed 47 times.

Rate article

This article has a 5 rating with 1 vote.

Article comments

There are no posted comments.

Related articles